 |
|
WAR
& PEACE
BY
BILL HANSEN- page 1 of 7 pages
War, man’s
most ignoble pursuit,
has unmistakable patterns of
recurrence. Violence has
a rhythm! By understanding
the cause of these patterns,
we may be able to diffuse the
periodic outbursts of mass hysteria
that lead to unconscionable
acts of violence. In the past
3,400 years, the world has enjoyed
only 200 years or so of absolute
peace. This grim historical
note is even more pathetic considering
the many religious crusades,
peace advocates, and martyrs
that have tried and failed to
discourage violence. It is easy
to shrug-off man’s penchant
for violence. Many people
accept the human being as an
aggressive and deadly animal
that preys not only on other
animals for food and sport but
are capable of wanton murder
of its own kind. At no
time is man’s predacious
nature more fully unleashed
than during war. Without
social restraints and under
the duress of battle, once peaceful
people will kill with little
provocation.
Those
who profess the virtues of peaceful
coexistence among archrivals have
been frustrated time and time
again. The desire for physical
conquest and subjugation of weaker
peoples is a strong human tendency. Yet
pockets of peaceful coexistence
among people do exist. The
Semai people of
Malaysia
never fight. Tribe members
resolve conflicts with words. The
final word comes from the village
leader who makes a ruling; thereafter,
the dispute is never mentioned.
Many members of the Society for
American Archaeology believe that
war is a social invention, a tool
of political states bent on territorial
control and economic expansion. War,
they argue, would have developed
about 10,000 years ago. Until
about a decade ago (revelations
during the Pluto perihelion) warfare
among primitive peoples was dismissed
as nonexistent. But recent
archaeological evidence supports
the opposing argument that war
is a basic element of human nature. Nearly
every primitive society ever studied
fought wars. Although cultures
such as the Semai are exceptions,
the Semai had strikingly high
homicide rates. They just
did not organize into groups to
fight one another. Raymond Kelly
makes an interesting point in
his Warless Societies and the
Origin of War (published 2000). Kelly
states that those cultures before
about 20,000 years ago lacked
the concept of group identity. As
societies settled into set communities
and became more agrarian, somewhere
between 10,000 and 20,000 years
ago, the concept of group identity
emerged. People then had
a community to fight for. This
theory finds support in archaeological
records. The oldest known
cemetery is in the Nile valley
of southern Egypt in what is called
Jebel Sahaba. The 59 skeletons
uncovered at Jebel Sahaba died
of sharp stone wounds. It
is here, between 12,000 and 14,000
years ago, that group warfare
first appeared
WAR
CYCLES
The
probabilities of war, like the
probabilities of rain, do not
guarantee results. But ignoring
the chances of showers can prove
uncomfortable in the event of
rain. War, on the other hand,
is a deadly game; lives are too
easily lost if preventative options
are thrown to chance. Edward
Dewey (1970) discovered an 11.24-year
cycle in war that cannot be the
result of chance more often than
once in 500 times! Dewey’s
cycle is a dependable forecasting
tool; to ignore this cycle would
be the greatest of follies.
The
fervor of violence is like an
outbreak of disease: if contained
locally, the impact is negligible. Most
wars are regional conflicts. Small-scale
wars usually do not expand beyond
a limited territory. But
battles can escalade into wars
just like a spreading disease
can grow into an epidemic. Conditions
must be right for widespread warfare,
but conditions are right every
11 years!
Dewey
wrote in “Cycles”
(Vol. 31, November 1980: Foundation
for the Study of Cycles), “It
is inconceivable that the war
cycle, which has recurred as regularly
as it has, and has continued over
nearly 2,500 years, could possibly
be the result of anything except
some external cause.” Dewey
did not believe that the Sun was
responsible for the war period
of 11 years, and yet sunspots
do seem to be a guiding force
leading humanity through times
of peace and times of war.
Although
worldwide peace seldom exists,
the number of people killed in
wars fluctuates in set rhythmic
patterns. A few local clashes
do not spell wider warfare unless
the cycle of war is heading up. When
the cycle of war nears its peak,
a number of large conflicts tend
to ignite, and smaller ongoing
wars tend to increase in severity. Once
the war-fever spreads, peaceful
conditions are lost until the
following low point in the war
cycle.
Relatively
peaceful conditions throughout
the world are most likely to end
within a year or two of sunspot
maximums. An increase in
local hostilities and the eruption
of large-scale war tends to occur
near the sunspot peak. Peace
resumes within a year or two of
sunspot minimums.

|
|
|
|
 |
|